PlayStation 4 vs. XBOX One

butent . bapkes uzkalt. ir cia net ne kurejai kalti del to o leidejai didieji. nes mazuju ar v idutiniu jau kaip ir neliko tai kaip jie pasakys kurejam taip ir turi but. labai nedaug kas dabar gali sau leist kurt ka nori.siti visi nauji cia zaidimai ten isskyrus AC4 gal tai na jei taip zaist tai savaitei laiko..ir ka po to veikt.. viskas. naujienu nebera.ten metais kuria tik info deda , tik visi spelioja seiles varvina..o pasirodo kad ..nieko ten nera tokio . bet tikrai nieko nera tokio ka sakyciau "va del to verta pirkt next gena". na nera.seniau buvo. gerai pamenu del ko pirkau ps1, ps2, ps3,x360, tikrai ne del paciu konsoliu o del zaidimu jom.

Nu taip, gal žaidimų kolkas ir nėra, kurie tau patiktų, bet ir pačių konsolių dar neišleido Vistiek, šita karta turės stipriausią launch žaidimų pasirinkimą, o žaidimų kiekis tik didės. Seniau tokio pasirinkimo tikrai nebuvo. Na gal tik PS2 turėjo nemažai launch žaidimų, bet ar tie, ar šitie yra geresni niekas neįrodys

Dėl AAA vs. indie, tai nereikia pamiršti kiek vieni ir kiek kiti investuoja. Indie gali sau leisti tam tikrus bandymus, nes rizika mažesnė ir dažniausiai tų žaidimų pagrindu yra viena kokia nors inovatyvi mechanika, kai tuo tarpu AAA turi sukurti "living and breathing" pasaulius. Jei negali kur nors pasukt į šoną jau išvadina "linear crap". O ką, ne taip? Inovacijų irgi, mano nuomone, pakanka. Jos nėra tokios dažnos ir drąsios kaip Indie, bet ir žmonių su jais daugiau dirba, kuriems reikia sumokėti ir kurie tikisi stabilumo. Lieviausia, kad kai AAA žaidimas bando kažką naujo parodyt, tai arba to neįvartinam, arba jį mažai kas perka. Assassin's Creed juk irgi keičiasi, Call of Duty gal ne tiek kiek norėtųsi. Pažiūrėkit į GTA, Tomb Raider, Watch Dogs, Division ir t.t. Kokių jums inovacijų reikia? Aišku, kiekvienam savo, nors ir per dažnai šitą frazę naudoju. Yra tų žaidimų ir turėsim ką žaist, nepergyvenkit

vargsai COD bicai prisidare sau problemu dabar konsoliu karuose

Call of Duty: Ghosts Producer Mark Rubin was interviewed today by Metro, and the interview took a rather weird turn as he was asked about the difference between Xbox One and PS4, with Rubin and a PR representative almost literally at a loss for words, and not because they didn’t want to respond.

 

All started with a relatively innocent question on whether the game’s resolution is the only difference between PS4 and Xbox One, and then things went downhill from there, with Rubin and the PR rep getting increasingly embarrassed as they were pressed with questions, and mentioning that they couldn’t say much due to non disclosure agreements they signed with the first parties (Microsoft and Sony).

 

Towards the end of the ordeal, Rubin was asked if he agrees with John Carmack and Shinji Mikami when they say that Xbox One and PS4 are almost identical:

 

 

 

Hmm… I would say that’s a bit inaccurate but I wouldn’t be able to tell you any detail of why that’s inaccurate.

 

When asked if he couldn’t elaborate further due to diplomatic reasons he confirmed, and explained that normally the reason behind this kind of response is an attempt to draw the attention of gamers away from technical details and back to the fact that the game is fun on every platform.

 

 

The key thing is we try to focus people away from that sort of thing and try to focus them on the fact that the game is fun no matter what platform it’s on.

 

Rubin also admitted that he has no idea on the possibility of the power gap between the two platforms closing in the future.

 

 

Don’t know. Until we get there I honestly don’t know. To be not diplomatic or anything [laughs] we really don’t know. We’ve done as much as we can in the time we have to get where we’re at. Will they close the gap? Will they go off in the opposite direction? Who knows? But for this game it is what it is.

 

GC: So, just finally, I have to ask: why does the PlayStation 4 version look so much better than the Xbox One? Is the resolution really the only difference?

 

MR: [laughs] Yep, it’s the only difference. The TVs are different on some of them, but… they both have their different rendering engines but they’re as close as possible. It really comes down to resolution. Xbox is upscaled 720, it’s outputting at 1080p but it’s upscaled from 720. Whereas PlayStation 4 is native 1080p. So that’s really the only graphical difference. But it is enough. Some people here are saying they don’t really notice a difference…

 

GC: Was that the guy with the white stick?

 

MR: [laugh] But yeah, the PS4 looks really good.

 

GC: Is the PC version still better?

 

MR: There’s actually some features that we’ve added to the PC that are definitively not on any other generation. We worked with Nvidia a lot with this, but we have a different form of anti-aliasing that’s really new and advanced – that isn’t on current or next gen. We have a fur shader on the dog and on the wolves, they actually have a moving fur shader that works really well, for PC. And the third one, which I think is one of the coolest ones, is we’re using Nvidia’s APEX Turbulence tech to have smoke that actually wisps and waves and moves out of the way of objects.

 

 

GC: So is that something the new consoles can’t do or you just didn’t have time to implement it?

 

MR: No, it’s… well, you can do almost anything, almost. Tessellation can’t be done on current gen for the most part, because it’s a DirectX 11 feature, but we could still do it but you’d get a frame rate of 2. So that really becomes the reason we do everything: the reason the Xbox One is 720, the reason the PlayStation 4 is 1080 is we’re trying to make the game look as good as it possible can and making sure we maintain our 60 frames per second.

 

We maintain the latency and the speed and the things that people actually care about. Even if they won’t admit it, the thing that makes Call Of Duty popular is how it feels, because of those priorities.

 

GC: So the obvious assumption from all this is that the PlayStation 4 is definitely more powerful than the Xbox One, is that true?

 

MR: [acting very embarrassed] I can’t answer that.

 

 

GC: You can’t answer it on a technical level or because you’re being diplomatic?

 

MR: Can’t answer that.

 

GC: You can’t say whether you’re avoiding the question for diplomatic reasons?

 

MR: [embarrassed] I just can’t say anything…

 

[Even the attending PR guy is looking embarrassed by this point]

 

PR guy: It’s very hard for us to be…

 

GC: Are the console manufacturers leaning on you to avoid these sort of questions?

 

MR: [unsure - speaking to PR guy] I don’t know if that…

 

MR: [even more embarrassed to us] Yeah, there’s things that we… We sign NDAs with the first parties [i.e. Microsoft and Sony - GC] and there are things that we’re not allowed to talk about.

 

GC: Do you think everyone else will have these same problems? All these other cross-generational games that are out at launch?

 

MR: Well, I think they’ve already said they are haven’t they? Battlefield 4 is 720 on Xbox One and I think 900 on PS4? Titanfall has said they’re 720… So we’re not the first to say we’re 720 on the Xbox One.

na faktai ant akiu ka jau cia padarysi.dauguma next gen zaidimu pas X1 eis 720p/30-60fps . Dead rising 3 pvz ..720p 30fps bus .

jau tokia didele deze ir nu niekaip ten i ja MS netelpa tas maitekas kad ir kaip jie stengtusi

paziurim PS4 isardyta ir paziurim kas cia per power mega brikas kuris atrodo kaip puse konsoles.

ka veikia ten ta tuscia vieta xbox1 ?

nes pas ps4 jis pilnas tiek kad viskas tilptu su maiteku. tai dabar pamegink ta maiteka isorini x1 ikist i vidu konsoles ..

x1 surinkimas atrodo lygiai kaip slimo. tik kad dalis pakeite. net nereikejo nieko galvot cia isvis nes viska isdeliojo taip paciai ir good. jau apie surinkimus tai cia tik patylet butu galima. kas arde PS3 ir mate kaip ten viskas sudeliota it kaip buvo x360

surinkimo prasme tai